Hi everyone,I’m Khanh Tung, an independent researcher. In this project, I’d like to share something a little different — a physics idea that started on paper, then became a testable method with real NASA data.
🔍 How it BeganFor years, I’ve been fascinated with orbital mechanics — especially how mass, velocity, and position interact. One thing always bothered me: mass is often treated as constant, even though we know Earth loses mass due to atmospheric escape (like hydrogen drifting into space).
So I started experimenting with a new idea:What if we explicitly include mass variation in orbital dynamics?
That’s how the NKTg Law was born.
🧩 The Core IdeaThe NKTg Law introduces two quantities:
NKTg₁ = x·pA simple interaction between distance x
and momentum p = m·v
- NKTg₁ = x·pA simple interaction between distance
x
and momentump = m·v
NKTg₂ = (dm/dt)·pA dynamic term accounting for mass loss per second (dm/dt
) and momentum
- NKTg₂ = (dm/dt)·pA dynamic term accounting for mass loss per second (
dm/dt
) and momentum
These aren’t just abstract formulas — they seem to stay nearly stable over time, even when mass changes.
🔬 Testing the IdeaTo verify it, I used publicly available Earth data from:
NASA JPL Horizons for position and velocity
- NASA JPL Horizons for position and velocity
NASA Earth fact sheet for mass
- NASA Earth fact sheet for mass
NASA climate science for atmospheric escape rates (~50 million kg/year)
- NASA climate science for atmospheric escape rates (~50 million kg/year)
I focused on data from 2022, then used the NKTg Law to predict values for 2023.
📊 What I FoundHere’s what stood out:
Earth’s mass loss is gradual but real (~1.42 million kg per quarter)
- Earth’s mass loss is gradual but real (~1.42 million kg per quarter)
To keep NKTg₁ stable, if mass m
and momentum p
decrease, distance x
increases slightly
- To keep NKTg₁ stable, if mass
m
and momentump
decrease, distancex
increases slightly
Velocity v
drops just a little — about 0.001 km/s, matching expectations from the formulas
- Velocity
v
drops just a little — about 0.001 km/s, matching expectations from the formulas
Incredibly, the predicted values for 2023 closely match observed trends, despite not using any 2023 measurements.
🌐 Beyond Earth?Yes — the NKTg Law seems to apply to other planets too. I ran the same formulas on Mars, Venus, and even gas giants like Jupiter — and the patterns of NKTg₁ and NKTg₂ consistency show up again.
🛠 Try It YourselfAll data sources are public. If you're into:
Orbital simulations
- Orbital simulations
Planetary dynamics
- Planetary dynamics
Physics models based on real data
- Physics models based on real data
...you can reproduce all calculations using a simple Python notebook and:
The basic formulas for p = m·v
, NKTg₁ = x·p
, and NKTg₂ = (dm/dt)·p
- The basic formulas for
p = m·v
,NKTg₁ = x·p
, andNKTg₂ = (dm/dt)·p
The NKTg Law isn’t meant to replace Newton or Kepler — but it might offer a fresh layer of understanding, especially for systems where mass isn’t constant.
I’d love to hear your thoughts — or better yet, see your own experiments with NKTg applied to Mars, Jupiter, or even exoplanets.
Let’s explore the solar system in new ways — starting with the data we already have.
Comments